Busy bodies minding other peoples business, don’t you just love them! All in the name and excuse of “public fill-in-the-blank.”
In Rocklin, California one person complained about his neighbor smoking outside on his own property, now a ban may be considered for outdoor smoking. Excuse me?
First off, there is no way possible for one person smoking outside, at least 50 feet away from others can affect their health.
Secondly, even in an enclosed area such as a bar, no healthy human being has ever died or gotten cancer or other types of ailments from secondhand smoke, that is a fact, contrary to the lies of the prohibitionists that impose their beliefs as your law and are actively pursuing the failure of prohibition on tobacco products, even though they look you in the eyes and lie by saying they are not.
Notice I said healthy in the above paragraph. Secondhand smoke in an enclosed area would indeed affect someone with an extreme case of asthma, a heart condition, or some other extreme chronic respiratory condition, but not a normal, healthy person, yeah, that includes children too.
At the end of the video the anchor raised excellent points when he stated there would be a constitutional-property rights conflict with a ridiculous ban like this proposed by a nosy neighbor.
As far as the Rocklin City Manager is concerned, this proposal is going nowhere. And that’s good news for freedom.
Rocklin City Manager Rick Horst said the city has “no intention of considering the matter.”