Hmmm… Well I guess I really don’t need to say much, this video says it all. It’s the truth and it’s the public record. What more can I say?
Tag Archives: lies
High Ranking EPA Official Admits Philosophy On Oil Companies: “Crucify Them”
Environmental Kook Al Armendariz, No Friend Of America
If this isn’t reason enough to depose Obama and eliminate the EPA, I don’t know what is.
We need to restore truth, justice and the American way. This crap must end.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) took to the Senate floor yesterday to draw attention to a video of a top EPA official saying the EPA’s “philosophy” is to “crucify” and “make examples” of oil and gas companies – just as the Romans crucified random citizens in areas they conquered to ensure obedience.
Inhofe quoted a little-watched video from 2010 of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official, Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz, admitting that EPA’s “general philosophy” is to “crucify” and “make examples” of oil and gas companies.
In the video, Administrator Armendariz says:
“I was in a meeting once and I gave an analogy to my staff about my philosophy of enforcement, and I think it was probably a little crude and maybe not appropriate for the meeting, but I’ll go ahead and tell you what I said:
“It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean. They’d go in to a little Turkish town somewhere, they’d find the first five guys they saw and they’d crucify them.
“Then, you know, that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.”
“It’s a deterrent factor,” Armendariz said, explaining that the EPA is following the Romans’ philosophy for subjugating conquered villages.
Soon after Armendariz touted the EPA’s “philosophy,” the EPA began smear campaigns against natural gas producers, Inhofe’s office noted in advance of yesterday’s Senate speech:
“Not long after Administrator Armendariz made these comments in 2010, EPA targeted US natural gas producers in Pennsylvania, Texas and Wyoming.
“In all three of these cases, EPA initially made headline-grabbing statements either insinuating or proclaiming outright that the use of hydraulic fracturing by American energy producers was the cause of water contamination, but in each case their comments were premature at best – and despite their most valiant efforts, they have been unable to find any sound scientific evidence to make this link.”
In his Senate speech, Sen. Inhofe said the video provides Americans with “a glimpse of the Obama administration’s true agenda.”
This administration is vile. No honesty, just the kooky ideology of un-American radicals that don’t live in the same universe as the rest of us.
Is there any big government lover that can actually justify the need to keep the EPA in business? Go ahead, try to justify it.
The EPA needs to be defunded and eliminated now.
The Kooks spin the non-existent Climate Change to Irene & hurricanes again (Yawn…)
Well that didn’t take very long, did it? The kooks are out in full force and lying to you about the hurricane threat and climate change. First off, there’s no such thing as climate change, but the radicals, kooks and other assorted jackwagons have started the tired and stale old lie that climate change is causing hurricanes to be more severe. Nevermind Irene was the first one in 3 years, and when it came ashore it wasn’t even strong enough to be classified a hurricane! Ahh, but that won’t stop the climate kooks from spreading their junk science as fact, as evidenced in the New York Times story, Seeing Irene as Harbinger of a Change in Climate. No, I’m not kidding. These whack jobs will stop at nothing to advance their fear-mongering and environmental extremist agenda.
The story in the Times written by Justin Gillis is complete propaganda, that lacks truth and evidence. You can clearly see the agenda he is pushing. He’s probably a disciple of Weird Al Gore.
The short answer from scientists is that they are still trying to figure it out. But many of them do believe that hurricanes will get more intense as the planet warms, and they see large hurricanes like Irene as a harbinger.
First off, THE PLANET IS NOT WARMING, period. The Argosy project proved beyond any doubt the Earth has actually cooled over the past 15-20 years. And, history has shown that we have had plenty of “large” hurricanes. The nonsense continues:
While the number of the most intense storms has clearly been rising since the 1970s…
That was a complete lie. A fabrication, nonsense, bullshit, whatever you want to call it, but I call it like it is. And it is a lie.
I did the research and pulled the statistics, something the agenda pushing climate kooks intentionally neglect to do, and the facts contradict the story line.
For the 40 year period of 1970-2009, counting only Category 3, 4 and 5 hurricanes, the United States was hit with 14. For the previous 40 years (1930-1969) the United States was hit with 38. As usual, the climate kooks are lying again.
2 of the 30 most deadly hurricanes of categories 3-5 occurred in the 40 year period between 1970-2009.
3. Katrina (2005), Category 3
29. Floyd (1999) Category 4
8 of the 30 most deadly hurricanes of Categories 3-5 occurred in the 40 year period between 1930-1969.
7. Audrey (1957) Category 4
8. Great Labor Day (1935) Category 5
15. Camille (1969) Category 5
16. New England (1938) Category 3
25. Hazel (1954) Category 4
26. Betsy (1965) Category 3
27. Great Atlantic (1944) Category 3
28. Carol (1954) Category 3
So who are you going to believe? Well, the stupid people will believe the climate kook alarmists, normal people will believe the documented facts.
Documents Show Obama White House Bias Toward Fox News Channel
Press Release from Judicial Watch:
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has uncovered documents from the Obama Department of Treasury showing that the Obama administration, contrary to its repeated denials, attempted to exclude the Fox News Channel (FNC) from a round of interviews with Treasury’s “Executive Pay Czar” Kenneth Feinberg. The documents, which include email exchanges within the Department of the Treasury and between Treasury and White House staff, also provide colorful evidence of an anti-Fox News bias within the Obama White House.
The documents, obtained last week by Judicial Watch pursuant to an October, 28, 2009, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, concern a series of interviews with Feinberg, who served as the Special Master for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Executive Compensation, on October 22, 2009, organized by the Treasury Department. According to press reports, the Fox News Channel was specifically excluded from joining the pool of reporters which precipitated a backlash among the networks and a reversal by the Obama Treasury Department.
According to The New York Times: “Fox’s television news competitors refused to go along with a Treasury Department effort on Thursday [October 22, 2009] to exclude Fox from a round of interviews with the executive-pay czar Kenneth R. Feinberg that was to be conducted with a ‘pool’ camera crew…”. Fox News Channel’s James Rosen reported this backlash forced the Obama administration to reconsider its position on the matter: “The Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV news network consulted and decided that none of them would interview Feinberg unless Fox was included, and the administration relented…,” reported Rosen. Ultimately, after other media representatives objected, Fox News Channel was allowed to participate in the interviews.
The Treasury Department’s official response, as detailed in back-and-forth emails uncovered by Judicial Watch, included a clear denial of any such plot to exclude Fox News from the interviews: “There was no plot to exclude Fox News, and they had the same interview that their competitors did. Much ado about absolutely nothing.” Moreover, in an October 23, 2009 email to New York Times reporter Jim Rutenberg, Jake Siewart, Counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, repeated the denial that there was an effort to exclude Fox News Channel: “Call me today on your Fox-Treasury report,” Siewart wrote. “Not true that there was an ‘effort to exclude’ Fox.”
However, despite this public position, internal Obama administration emails obtained by Judicial Watch provide evidence that FNC was specifically singled out for exclusion. According to one October 22, 2009, email exchange between Dag Vega, Director of Broadcast Media on the White House staff, to Jenni LeCompte, then-Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs in the Treasury Department, Vega informs LeCompte that “…we’d prefer if you skip Fox please.”
Regarding general anti-FNC bias within the Obama White House in an October 23, 2009, email exchange between Jennifer Psaki, Deputy White House Communications Director and LeCompte, Psaki writes, “I am putting some dead fish in the fox cubby – just cause”. In an email on the night of October 22, 2009, commenting on a report by Fox News Channel anchor Bret Baier noting the exclusion of the network from the pool, Psaki writes to Compte and fellow White House colleagues, “…brett baier just did a stupid piece on it — but he is a lunatic”.
Deputy White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest bluntly described the White House’s position on Fox News Channel in an October 23, 2009, email to LeCompte: “We’ve demonstrated our willingness and ability to exclude Fox News from significant interviews…”
The Treasury Department blacked out a key email regarding its refusal to make available Treasury Secretary Geithner for an interview on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace.
“The Obama administration seems to have lied about its attempt to exclude Fox News Channel from access to an interview with the ‘pay czar.’ These documents show there is a pervasive anti-Fox bias in the Obama White House,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The juvenile Mafioso-talk in these emails has no place in any White House. For the Obama administration to purposely exclude a major news organization from access to information has troubling First Amendment implications.”
The Alliance For A Better Minnesota
The progressive Alliance For A Better Minnesota really is a piece of work. Have you looked at there website lately? Your jaw will drop, and you’ll wonder what planet those people are living on, and you’ll realize that Dr. Rossiter’s findings are correct. Leftism is a mental illness. I was absolutely stunned at the gibberish and the lies being told on that site. I’m surprised they haven’t been sued. They are, without question, left-wing kook radicals and militants.
But I’m not doing an attack piece on their website, we’re singling out just one ad that they are running on TV, and there’s only one part of that ad that I’m focussing on. For the record, the rest of that ad is a total lie, and that’s why I’m surprised they haven’t been sued over it.
In case you want to look at the full ad, you’ll need to go to their website to view it. All I did was edit the two pieces in that ad that this post is about. This is truly stunning. Watch.
TRANSCRIPT:
Woman #1: “All so the richest 2% don’t have to chip in”
Woman #2 “And 98% of Minnesotans will have no tax increase”
“Chip in” indicates that everyone has “chipped in” to the pot. So how come 98% of Minnesotans don’t have to “chip in?” That’s not fair. Why should 2% of the population “chip in” to pay for 98% of the populations free lunch? How is that fair?
I think the other 98% need to “chip in” and pay their fair share. It’s the right thing to do.
Tyrannical White House Bullies Reporter, Lies And Attempts Cover-Up
Tyrants don’t like the truth, they are fearful of it. I’ve told you time and time again Obama is a tyrant. I’m going to give you another example, then you’ll maybe understand why he’s hellbent on controlling the media which includes the internet.
You probably heard about this, I didn’t post about it right away because I wanted to see how it played out without jumping to conclusions. It played out just as I expected it would.
Obama’s fundraiser in San Francisco was met with protesters. Some of them sang a little song to him about “Where’s my change?” That doesn’t fit the tyrants narrative and he didn’t want that video made public. How’s that for “openness and transparency?” I still have to pinch myself to see if I’m still in the United States, it more resembles East Germany circa, 1980.
via The Blaze:
The chronology of events is as follows:
- The President attends a Democratic Party fundraising event in San Francisco.
- Print Pool reporters (a small, pre-approved group of newspaper journalists that simultaneously feed their coverage to all outlets) are in attendance.
- A protest erupts and one of the pool reporters catches it on video. (Citizens in attendance recorded this as well)
- The reporter posts the video online.
- The White House bans the reporter from future pool coverage, threatens to ban affiliated reporters if the ban is exposed
- The ban is exposed.
- The White House denies banning reporter, denies threatening other reporters, and apparently reinstates the reporter.
And now we have this update from the San Francisco Chronicle:
In a pants-on-fire moment, the White House press office today denied anyone there had issued threats to remove Carla Marinucci and possibly other Hearst reporters from the press pool covering the President in the Bay Area.
Chronicle editor Ward Bushee called the press office on its fib:
Sadly, we expected the White House to respond in this manner based on our experiences yesterday. It is not a truthful response. It follows a day of off-the-record exchanges with key people in the White House communications office who told us they would remove our reporter, then threatened retaliation to Chronicle and Hearst reporters if we reported on the ban, and then recanted to say our reporter might not be removed after all.
The Chronicle’s report is accurate.
If the White House has indeed decided not to ban our reporter, we would like an on-the-record notice that she will remain the San Francisco print pool reporter.
I was on some of those calls and can confirm Ward’s statement.
Messy ball now firmly in White House court.
Who said Obama doesn’t have an enemies list? Who said Obama doesn’t resemble Richard Nixon? You need to pull your head out of your stink hole. It’s time for Americans to rally together and remove Obama from office next year and take our country back, 2016 will be too late. Obama belongs in a prison cell, not the oval office.
Here’s the video in question: