Really. I’m agreeing with Democrats and I’m not being sarcastic, I’m really being quite “bipartisan.” Honest Injun. What’s the punch line you might be thinking? Oh yeah, there is one. But I can say with complete abandon, this is bipartisan and I agree with a large and growing number of Democrats. Everyday Democrats, Democrat pollsters and operatives. Democrat members of congress, so you can’t say I’m a partisan shill. I’m very bipartisan on this issue, and the issue is… Hillary Clinton would be a better president. There’s no doubt about that in my mind.
Now you’re not going to get this story in the American media, as we all know it’s nothing but propaganda these days with all the media types noses stuck so far up Barack Obama’s ass, all they can see is his colon. This is from the U.K. Telegraph:
President Barack Obama is facing mounting doubts within his own party about his re-election prospects, with fellow Democrats beginning to ask if Hillary Clinton would have made a better president.
Oh, I don’t have much doubt that Hillary would be better, but I guess we’ll never know. And get a load of this. Big time Democrats are privately comparing Obama to Jimmy Carter! HA! HA! HA! LMAO!!! Newsflash you guys, there’s no comparison. Carter was better!
Finding it hard to defend his often listless and repetitive performances, Democrat strategists and commentators are privately agreeing with Republicans and comparing Mr Obama to Jimmy Carter, another Democrat who remains the post-war benchmark for a failed president.
HA! HA! HA! LMAO!!! One and done! Sayonara, see ya later, don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out!
Mr Obama’s approval rating has fallen dramatically since the killing of Osama bin Laden in early May, and he has failed to outline a vision for how he will improve chronic unemployment and a housing market in which one if five mortgage holders are in negative equity.
A 2012 primary challenge by Mrs Clinton is currently regarded as unlikely, but a growing number of party activists and old hands are hoping that she changes her mind.
I think she would win her party’s nomination if she tried it one more time. But like most, I don’t see her going through the grind of a campaign again. She looks tired and worn out, completely drained as it is, and I don’t mean that as a slam on Mrs. Clinton, merely an observation.
An article in the New York Times by Drew Westen, a professor of psychology at Emory University and a specialist in political messaging, summarised the dismay at Mr Obama’s performance and was rapidly circulated online by liberals.
“Those of us who were bewitched by his eloquence on the campaign trail chose to ignore some disquieting aspects of his biography: that he had accomplished very little before he ran for president,” he wrote.
Bewitched by his eloquence? How could anybody be that stupid? An awful lot of people were. Good God I had him figured out long before he even ran for president, when he gave his speech at the Democrat convention in 2006. And this Drew Westen is a professor? I guess he’s the poster child for the old saying about professors. Nothing but, “educated idiots.”
