Obama plans to slash nuclear weapons, China, Russia to become dominant military superpowers

I told you when Obama came to power that to fulfill his socialist ideology, to pay for it, the military would be cut to nothing, we would be weak and vulnerable. Well I told you so. This happens every single time socialism is implemented. Obama has plans to do just that.

Under his proposal, our nukes would be cut to about 300, less than China, far less than Russia. We will cease being the worlds most powerful military, and we will fall to number 3, then worse as he tries to implement the rest of his policy which is the complete abandonment of nuclear weapons.

In the meantime Iran is developing a nuclear arsenal and rockets capable of hitting the United States, North Korea is doing the same, China is massively expanding its military, and Russia is building up as well. These are just a few examples of what’s happening in the real world, as opposed to the ideologue Obama’s funny little world that exists outside the realm of reality.

This policy is much, much worse than anything the Carter Administration did. President Carter would be a “Hawk” compared to Obama (not to mention much more competent and realistic). Barack Obama is the worst excuse of a president in the entire history of this country. If he follows through, he will be in direct violation of his oath of office, and should be impeached and tried as a traitor.

Obama has ordered the Pentagon to consider cutting U.S. strategic nuclear forces to as low as 300 deployed warheads—below the number believed to be in China’s arsenal and far fewer than current Russian strategic warhead stocks.

Pentagon and military planners were asked to develop three force levels for the U.S. arsenal of deployed strategic nuclear warheads: a force of 1,100 to 1,000 warheads; a second scenario of between 700 and 800 warheads; and the lowest level of between 300 and 400 warheads.

A congressional official said no president in the past ever told the Pentagon to conduct a review based on specific numbers of warheads.

“In the past, the way it worked was, ‘tell me what the world is like and then tell me what the force should be,’” the official said. “That is not happening in this review.”

The plan for a radical cut in warheads is contained in a review of nuclear weapons ordered by the president in an August directive. The review called the Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Study is nearing completion and could be presented to the president as early as next month.

The plan has come under fire from senior military officers in charge of maintaining nuclear deterrence against Russia, China, and future nuclear rogue states [...]

Critics of the nuclear force cuts in Congress and the national security community said the force structure is being studied without matching the need for nuclear forces to combat growing threats, as was done in past strategic nuclear reviews [...]

John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador and undersecretary of state for international security during the George W. Bush administration, said in an interview that the administration’s plan to cut nuclear force to as low as 300 “alone is sufficient to vote against Obama in November.”

“Congress should urgently adopt a resolution rejecting the idea that any of these levels is consistent with American national security,” Bolton said. “Let’s just see who is prepared to support Obama.”

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney said even considering such deep strategic cuts is irrational.

“No sane military leader would condone 300 to 400 warheads for an effective nuclear deterrent strategy,” McInerney told the Washington Free Beacon.

“Going down to 1000 to 1,100 is risky enough and frankly in today’s world, very risky. The purpose of our nuclear force structure is to deter any adversary from even thinking that they could minimize our attack options. Such thinking is very dangerous and will only encourage our adversaries to make bold decisions.”

A congressional official and former administration official familiar with the ongoing review said the bottom level warhead levels raise serious questions about whether a nuclear force that size would deter adversaries. It also would raise questions about so-called “extended deterrence,” the threat to use nuclear weapons against states like North Korea on behalf of allies like Japan.

The new strategic review reflects the president’s 2009 speech in Prague when he said the United States would pursue peace and security in a world “without nuclear weapons.”

Barack Obama is a 100% pure ideologue, period. He lives in a fantasy world and is willing to put us in jeopardy, all for his fucked-in-the-head, dumbass ideology that only half-wit buffoons agree with, no change that, only traitors agree with his policies.

November can’t come soon enough. That menace needs to be shown the exit.

Additional Post Information: Associated Press