The current president has an enemies list, just like President Nixon. But Obama’s enemies list is much larger than Tricky Dick’s.

This president is a thug using his position to intimidate, harass and extort. He is a criminal much like Sam Giancana of The Outfit. What he is doing reminds me of how they did it in the Soviet Union when the Secretary General died and there was a power struggle to fill that void.

How would you like to be a contributor to a candidate, exercising your 1st Amendment rights to a candidate running against the president, only to have that president single you out by name and slander you? Remember, you’re just a private citizen. You’ve done nothing wrong, except disagree with the job the president is doing, and want another person with another vision to take his place. Same as anybody else in this country did in 2008 and before.

And to make matters worse, the president uses the full weight of his power and turns the federal government loose on you to destroy you. That’s what Barack Obama is doing. Yeah, he’s real presidential, isn’t he? That’s what most of us call tyranny. In fact, the dictionary even defines it that way, or similar.

The Obama years have indeed been America’s darkest, that includes the Civil War years.

He is a tyrant that must be deposed.

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for “betting against America,” and accuses you of having a “less-than-reputable” record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon’s “enemies list” appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled “Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney’s donors.” In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having “less-than-reputable records,” the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that “quite a few” have also been “on the wrong side of the law” and profiting at “the expense of so many Americans.”

….These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly assaulting them.

“We don’t tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things,” says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor general. “When you have the power of the presidency—the power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA, the SEC—what you have effectively done is put these guys’ names up on ‘Wanted’ posters in government offices.” Mr. Olson knows these tactics, having demanded that the 44th president cease publicly targeting Charles and David Koch of Koch Industries, which he represents. He’s been ignored.

The real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges, is that they have given money to Mr. Romney….

…He’s targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans. Or they could quit donating to the GOP—Mr. Obama’s real aim.

The White House has couched its attacks in the language of “disclosure” and the argument that corporations should not have the same speech rights as individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation, “he’s doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his policies.” Any giver, at any level, risks reprisal from the president of the United States.

Any giver, at any level. Is that unbelievable, or what? What did I tell you about Obama? Who’s right again? Yup, I am. Thank me very much.

Here’s a personal message for Team Obama and the White House. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. I don’t get intimidated, I get more than even. Bring it on.

I’m going to donate money and time to the Romney campaign. A lot of money and a lot of time. My purpose in life between now and November is beating you. So, what are you going to do about it? Like I said, bring it on.

It’s getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super PACs are helping the GOP to level the playing field against Democrat super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr. Romney. The White House’s new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his donors) as it seeks to frighten others out of giving.

The Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to “hold the eventual Republican nominee accountable,” but this is a dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that transcend those of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that gives every American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If Mr. Obama isn’t going to act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn’t deserve to be one.

No. He doesn’t deserve to be one. He’s a bully, and bullies deserve to be punched in the face and have their noses bloodied. I’m willing.