“The liberty to pursue happiness.”
OK, so Nancy Pelosi doesn’t actually say “Never mind the Constitution” in this clip, but she practically has before and she might as well have this time, too. While I firmly believe that the Founding documents are best understood in conjunction with each other (as Rick Santorum says, “If the Constitution
Listening to the lies of the politicians as presented by the prattle of the biased it is easy to lose hope in a secular sense. My hope in an eternal sense is founded on the rock of an unshakable faith in Jesus and so it cannot be shaken. However, in the secular resting, as it must upon the shifting sands of man in America today, hope as a measured commodity is all too often hopeless. Seeking for hope in current events, a diamond among the discards and a point of light in a sea of
The Declaration and the Constitution have been thrown out the window by the Obama Administration.
There’s no doubt that these are two of the most impressive and influential documents in history. The founding fathers of our country provided a framework for democracy that has stood the test of time. And yet when it comes to actual governing, that framework seems to have been forgotten. It deserves to be revisited.
On our most recent episode, Larry Arnn, president of Hillsdale College, asserts, “Our government needs to have a different character than it does today.” In the interview, Larry Arnn evaluates whether or not Paul Ryan’s plan and George W. Bush’s foreign policy decisions would be considered “constitutional” from a technical standpoint. And he expresses concern that the quality of our government is diminishing with each passing second.
What do you think? Should politicians strictly abide by the principles laid out by the Declaration and the Constitution? Is the President? What about your favorite candidate – are his or her positions in adherence to our Constitution?
To hear Larry Arnn’s interpretation of modern politics and more, watch the full interview below.
Read the rest at Big Government